A telephonic talk between a guardian and a coaching teacher probably shook the stiff ground so hard, that it did bring no tremor due to their longer conversation. Also, there were no seismic alerts on the quite efficient seismometer installed at a particular place. Even the vibration was not around equal to a 0.1-magnitude tremor. The teacher talked in a very egotistic manner, with no doubt.
If the student concerned avoids going to a so-called educational counselling tour, the coaching class teacher in a searing tone terms it as a highly irresponsible matter. When the father of the student made it clear that it was he who prevented him from going to the tour, the teacher did not mind saying that you are showing an attitude.
The student hesitated to go on such sort of excursion owing to his pre-board exams. Even his guardian asked him to go also. It would be far better for him to prepare for the exam than to waste time on such a sort of educational tour.
The case came to be additionally serious when the teacher raised a swift demand to pay a considerable amount of money as a fine for remaining absent. The teacher then takes shelter in pointing out or the point of having no prior information on the part of the student in this regard. He seemed to hint that the tour was mandatory for the students.
On inquiring about the tour, it was learnt that only the rounds of that institution were conducted and the bus returned by 2 p.m. The students go to coaching for gaining knowledge in subjects but the teachers goad them to embark upon the educational counselling tour. Had the high school pupils grown up adequately to apprehend the counselling? How could they if they have yet to be more mature gripping the orb of counselling?